Posted on 16 Dec 2016
Our post recommending that DJs stop exploitation iTunes to organize their music libraries recently definitely got people talking, with a few 50/50 splits among fans and haters of iTunes. But I'm aware we left some people who aren't sure in pain, pointing out what's wrong with iTunes without fully outlining a preferred alternative.
This post will help. It is designed to empower you, by showing you that as long as you follow the five steps of good music library organization, you can organize your library any damn method you wish, and with any tools you wish (and affirmative, that has iTunes). The funny thing is the DJs who had strong views for/against iTunes in our previous post generally all "get this" already... which is precisely why they're fine with how they do things right now.
So if you are still feeling a music library organization is confusing you, read on.
OK so right off, then, here they are:
1. Only admit to your DJ library the tunes you actually know you'll want to DJ with -
and purge it of something else; the remainder of your music does not belong there
2. Make sure your files contain the metadata that's important to you -
as a minimum creative artist, title, any remix title, year, and genre
3. Know how to sort and filter your files and how to listen to the day-to-day -
when you're not actually DJing or practising
4. Have some way of selecting a group of potential tunes any particular gig -
and of getting that set of tunes into your DJ software (or to your gig with you in another way)
5. Have some way of often backing up -
not solely your music files, however, any work is done on them with the other package you employ (ie cue points etc)
If your music library "system" can tick all five boxes, it really doesn't matter how you do it or what tools you use. DJs do that all types of the way. Just from recent memory, in real DJ booths and among people I know, I've seen DJs:
I really could go on. And while there are of course pluses and minuses to all of the above systems, they all worked for each of those DJs. The reason they work, though, is not due to the system itself (whichever one they'd settled on), but that all of those DJs were - underneath it all - applying (whether consciously or subconsciously) the five steps listed at the start of this post.
That meant they were cool with their music collection. They were confident of finding what they wanted. And if they wanted to switch to a different way of doing it for whatever reason (change of software, DJing on a different set-up, wanting to ditch a particular program they've been using, whatever), they would be able to do so with the minimum possible pain, due to understanding and applying the five steps.
Now, I do grasp these things is confusing, and I know it doesn't come naturally to many DJs, especially those used to CDs and vinyl (no surprise that the first 2 ways on top of area unit most popular by simply such - typically older - DJs). We have always spent a lot of time teaching this in our courses for just that reason. We're also going to come back to this subject here on the blog soon, in order to bring you more insight.
But this will help too: I want all you readers with music organization systems you love to tell us below how you do it. Try and keep it short (we do not would like all the details), and take a look at and visit however your methodology ticks the boxes on top of (the 5 steps). The idea is to let other readers see how you do it too - help them spot similarities, differences, new ideas and potential issues with the way they're doing it.
And finally, if you're still stuck about all of this, please feel free to ask any questions - I'll be happy to chime in and help you out in any way I can.
Login to post comment